These may seem like small issues, even down to single turns of phrase. In my mind it is not even so much an issue over printing Trump’s response, but that there was not an immediate refutation of his claims by the article’s author in the piece itself. It is dangerous to give Donald Trump, a known and habitual liar, the opportunities to attempt to paint lies as truth. Plenty of readers noticed The Times’s failure to rebut Trump. The Times’s own reporting shows this, as does that of other news outlets. What’s more, the rest of Trump’s contention - that he had never met Kovaleski, and that the reporter had been trying to walk back a story - are simply not true. As it turns out, the facts align more closely with Streep’s account, as most anyone who looks at the video would see. It let Streep give her version (that he was mocking a disabled reporter) and Trump give his (that he wasn’t). Nowhere in its news coverage Monday did The Times challenge the truthfulness of Trump’s account. ![]() And it wrote a separate story on Trump’s reaction to Streep’s remarks, in which Trump insisted in an interview with The Times once more that he was not mocking Kovaleski, but merely imitating a flustered reporter who was trying to back away from a story he had written. In its main story of Streep’s speech, it referred to Trump “appearing to mock” a disabled reporter at The Times. ![]() This time, however, The Times adopted more of a he-said-she-said approach when it described Trump’s remarks at the rally. Trump, campaigning in 2015 when he made fun of a disabled reporter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |